Why Do 'Rhetorical' Speech Acts Emerge in Digital Era Communication?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.8739

Keywords:

Rhetorical speech acts, digital communication, pragmatics, food vloggers

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the factors driving the emergence of rhetorical speech acts in digital communication culture, particularly in food vlog content on YouTube. Rhetorical speech acts are proposed as a new category within illocutionary speech act theory, focusing on the use of rhetorical questions to influence, direct thinking, and emphasize points without expecting direct answers. 

Methods: The method employed is qualitative with a netnographic approach, where data were collected from three prominent Indonesian food vloggers: Tanboy Kun, Nex Carlos, and Mgdalenaf. 

Results: The study results show that  rhetorical speech acts emerge as a way for vloggers to enhance audience engagement and highlight key points. Unlike conventional speech acts such as assertives, directives, and expressives, rhetorical speech acts focus more on creating cognitive and curious effects without requiring an explicit response. 

Conclusion: The study recommends that rhetorical speech acts have become an essential component of dynamic and flexible digital communication, enriching speech act theory with new dimensions relevant to modern communication. This study also recommends further research on the application of rhetorical speech acts across various digital platforms and encourages content creators to optimize these strategies to enhance engagement and message effectiveness in digital interactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Shboul, O. K., Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Hamdan, H. J., & Alqbailat, N. (2024). Macro and micro analysis of motivational speech acts in Biden’s political speech. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 362-373.

Andersen, R. (2014). Rhetorical work in the age of content management: Implications for the field of technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(2), 115-157.

Antas, J., & Majewska, M. (2020). In search of a unit of speech. Methodological reflections sparked by a new understanding of language. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium, 5(2), 1-19.

Anwar, M., Amir, F. R., Anoegrajekti, N., & Muliastuti, L. (2021). Language impoliteness among Indonesian on Twitter. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 161-176.

Atlas, J. D. (2006). Presupposition. In The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 29-52).

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

Bendrat, A. (2019). Rhetoric in digital communication: Merging tradition with modernity. Res Rhetorica, 6(3), 111-124.

Bossens, E., Geerts, D., Storms, E., Nuytemans, M., & Boesman, J. (2022, April). RHETORiC: An audience conversation tool that restores civility in news comment sections. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (pp. 1-7).

Chen, S. (2021). The reproduction of “Petro-Nationalism” in ethnic media: A case study of WeChat public accounts’ coverage of the trans mountain pipeline controversy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 802757.

Choi, E., Shin, S. H., Ryu, J. K., Jung, K. I., Kim, S. Y., & Park, M. H. (2020). Commercial video games and cognitive functions: Video game genres and modulating factors of cognitive enhancement. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 16, 1-14.

Collins, P. (2021). Clause types. In B. Aarts, A. McMahon, & L. Hinrichs (Eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics (2nd ed., Chapter 8). John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dreißigacker, A., Müller, P., Isenhardt, A., & Schemmel, J. (2024). Online hate speech victimization: Consequences for victims’ feelings of insecurity. Crime Science, 13(1), 1-13.

Du Plessis, C. (2013). An exploration of digital rhetoric in a social network environment. Communicare: Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa, 32(1), 1-20.

Ekoro, D. E., & Gunn, M. (2021). Speech act theory and Gricean pragmatics: A review. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 18(4), 130-143.

Ene, C. (1983). Rhetorical questions within the theory of speech acts. Retrieved from: https://dspace.bcu-iasi.ro/handle/123456789/14695

Farinde, R. O., & Oyedokun-Alli, W. A. (2020). Pragmatics and language teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(5), 841-846.

Frank, J. (1990). You call that a rhetorical question?: Forms and functions of rhetorical questions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), 723-738.

Frobenius, M. (2014). Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 59-72.

Harwanto, E. R. (2022). Covers of music and songs without no license agreement of the creator and copyright holder carried out by corporate and individual black YouTubers on the YouTube channel. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 1(3), 81-98.

Hisham, H. A., & Hashim, F. (2022). Promoting political engagement among youth: Analysis of speech act patterns in Syed Saddiq's speech. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(3), 296-308.

House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2023). Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching, 1-12.

Ilie, C. (2010). Speech acts and rhetorical practices in parliamentary question time. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 55(4), 333-342.

Jones, K., & Scott, H. (2021). Virtual interactions and the dynamics of digital communication. International Journal of Communication, 15(1), 214-232.

Kecskes, I. (2023). On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. In The Socio-Cognitive Approach to Communication and Pragmatics (pp. 255-274). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Kedrowicz, A. A., & Taylor, J. L. (2016). Shifting rhetorical norms and electronic eloquence: TED talks as formal presentations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(3), 352-377.

Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., & Keyling, T. (2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media+Society, 1(2), 2056305115610141.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Maity, D., & Racat, M. (2018). The role of audience comments in YouTube vlogs: An abstract. In Boundary Blurred: A Seamless Customer Experience in Virtual and Real Spaces: Proceedings of the 2018 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference 46 (pp. 551-551). Springer International Publishing.

Mazzarella, D., & Domaneschi, F. (2018). Presuppositional effects and ostensive-inferential communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 138, 17-29.

Medina, M., Portilla, I., & Pereira, T. (2023). Questioning media audience engagement for advertising purposes and content creation. Revista de Comunicación, 22(2), 339-352.

Mgdalenaf. (2023). Mgdaleaf YouTube Channel. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/c/Mgdalenaf

Mirzaei, A., Hashemian, M., & Safari, F. (2016). Exploring rhetorical-discursive moves in Hassan Rouhani’s inaugural speech: A eulogy for moderation. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(2), 39-54.

Morales Sánchez, M. I., & Martín Villarreal, J. P. (2019). Double-click rhetoric: Rhetorical strategies of communication in the digital context. Res Rhetorica, 6(1), 1-16.

Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlogendorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 226-234.

Nex Carlos. (2023). Nex Carlos YouTube Channel. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/c/NexCarlos

Nham, N. T., Cai, X., & Wannaruk, A. (2022). Rhetorical structure and politeness strategies in complaint letters used by international students in a Thai ELF context. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(4), 67-81.

Ninio, A. (2018). Pragmatic Development. Routledge.

Oishi, E. (2022). Illocutionary-act-type sensitivity and discursive sequence: An examination of quotation. Intercultural Pragmatics, 19(3), 381-406.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Post, E. G., Trigsted, S. M., Schaefer, D. A., Cadmus-Bertram, L. A., Watson, A. M., McGuine, T. A., ... & Bell, D. R. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of youth sports coaches regarding sport volume recommendations and sport specialization. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 34(10), 2911-2919.

Rafiq, M. (2017). A pragmatic analysis of rhetorical questions in selected American political speeches. Journal of Garmian University, 4(3), 636-655.

Rahayu, S. (2020). Types of speech acts and principles of mother’s politeness in mother and child conversation. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(1), 1-9.

Ranganath, S., Hu, X., Tang, J., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2018). Understanding and identifying rhetorical questions in social media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 9(2), 1-22.

Rao, A., Morstatter, F., Hu, M., Chen, E., Burghardt, K., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2021). Political partisanship and antiscience attitudes in online discussions about COVID-19: Twitter content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e26692.

Riddick, S. A. (2019). Deliberative drifting: A rhetorical field method for audience studies on social media. Computers and Composition, 54(1), 1-26.

Sbisà, M. (2013). Locution, illocution, perlocution. In W. Bublitz (Ed.), Pragmatics of Speech Actions (pp. 25-75). De Gruyter Mouton.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Sîmboteanu, T. (2023). Transferul ilocuţionar în cazul actelor de vorbire expresive de tip salut, felicitare, amenințare, jurământ, blestem, urare. In Lecturi in Memoriam Acad. Silviu Berejan (pp. 55-62). Institutul de Filologie Romana.

Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2020). Social media use in 2020: A year in review. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1485-1502.

Špago, D. (2016). Rhetorical questions or rhetorical uses of questions?. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 102-115.

Spiliotopoulos, T., & Oakley, I. (2021). Understanding motivations for social media use: A uses and gratifications study focused on Facebook and Twitter. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2620-2639.

Sugihartana, B., & Rusadi, U. (2024). Prosumer and digital labor on food vlogger as word of mouth power in the digital era. International Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 77-84.

Tanboy Kun. (2023). Tanboy Kun YouTube Channel. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/c/TanboyKun

Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2019). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 7(1), 2-10.

Villarroel Ordenes, F., Grewal, D., Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K. D., Mahr, D., & Wetzels, M. (2019). Cutting through content clutter: How speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 988-1012.

Wang, J., & Liu, L. (2019). The evolution of digital communication: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 4-18.

Wang, X. (2014). A cognitive pragmatic study of rhetorical questions. English Language and Literature Studies, 4(1), 42-47.

Witek, M. (2021). Illocution and accommodation in the functioning of presumptions. Synthese, 198(7), 6207-6244.

Yao, M.Z., & Ling, R. (2020). What is computer-mediated communication?. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 4-8.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zaitsu, A., Wehbe, J., Hacquard, V., & Lidz, J. (2021). Clause types and speech acts in speech to children. Experiments in Linguistic Meaning, 1, 284-297.

Zhang, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Exploring audience engagement in YouTube vlogs through consumer engagement theory: The case of UK beauty vlogger Zoe Sugg. First Monday, 28(4), 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Rahman, F., Rafli, Z., & Anwar, M. (2025). Why Do ’Rhetorical’ Speech Acts Emerge in Digital Era Communication?. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 53(5), 8739. https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.8739

Issue

Section

Foreign Languages
Received 2024-08-15
Accepted 2024-12-03
Published 2025-12-01