A Variationist Approach to Complementizer Agreement in Jordanian Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i2.3614Keywords:
Linguistics, sociolinguistics, agreement, person features, complementizer agreement, jordanian arabic, variationist approachAbstract
Objectives: This study aims to assess the impact of linguistic and social factors on the compatibility of source tools in the Jordanian dialect.
Method: Thirty-six sociolinguistic interviews were conducted with 36 speakers residing in Jordan's capital, Amman. These interviews were recorded using a high-sensitivity, low-disturbance digital voice recorder and were transcribed into pre-prepared Excel tables. Statistical work was conducted, considering the coding protocol and using the GoldVarb X software. The study centered on three social factors: gender, educational level, and age, and three linguistic factors: sentence type, actor definition, and actor identification.
Results: The study found that complementizer agreement is not limited by any social factors but is connected to one of the linguistic factors discussed in the study, namely, nominal characteristics (1st person, 2nd person, and 3rd person). This is due to the presence of a "common context" in cases involving the 1st person and 2nd person, while this context is not evident with the 3rd person.
Conclusion: The study concluded that social factors do not influence grammatical diversity, unlike phonological diversity, which can be affected by social factors.
Downloads
References
Abed-El-Jawad, H. (1981). Lexical and phonological variation in spoken Arabic in Amman. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Abdullah, H., & Dejani, B.A. (2014). A Comparative Study on Definiteness and Indefiniteness in Arabic and Malay Languages. Dirasat Human and Social Sciences, 41(1), 436-452.
Adger, D., & Smith, J. (2005). Variation and the Minimalist Program. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social (pp. 149-178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Adger, D., & Harbour, D. (2007). Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax, 10(1), 2-37.
Ackema, P., & Neeleman, A. (2018). Features of person: From the inventory of persons to their morphological realization (Vol. 78). MIT Press.
Al-Batal, M. (1994). Connectives in Arabic diglossia: the case of Lebanese Arabic. In M. Eid, V. Cantarino & K. Walters (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics VI (pp. 91-120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Al-Khatib, M. (1988). Sociolinguistic change in an expanding urban context: A case study of Irbid city. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham, UK.
Almansour, A.H. (2012). A phase-based approach to the construct state. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 24(1), 23-34.
Al-Shawashreh, E. (2016). Aspects of grammatical variation in Jordanian Arabic. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Canada.
Al-Wer, E. (2009). Variation. In Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics IV (627-639, 1-20).
Al-Wer, E. (2007). The formation of the dialect of Amman. In C. Miller, E. Al-Wer, D. Caubet & J. Watson (Eds.), Arabic in the City: Issues in Dialect Contact and Language Variation (pp. 1-9). Routledge.
Al-Wer, E. (1991). Phonological variation in the speech of women from three urban areas in Jordan. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, UK.
Al Wer, E. (2013). Education as a speaker variable. In Language contact and language conflict in Arabic (pp. 59-71). Routledge.
Al-Wer, E. (2002). Jordanian and Palestinian dialects in contact: Vowel raising in Amman. Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 86, 63-80.
Barlow, M., & Ferguson, C.A. (Eds.). (1988). Agreement in natural language. Center for the Study of Language (CSLI).
Bassiouney, R. (2009). The variety of housewives and cockroaches: Examining code-choice in advertisements in Egypt. In Arabic Dialectology (pp. 271-284). Brill.
Belyayeva, D. (1997). Definiteness realization and function in Palestinian Arabic. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science, Series 4, 47-68.
Bock, J.K., & Irwin, D.E. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 19(4), 467-484.
Bock, J.K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological review, 89(1), 1.
Brustad, K. (2000). The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Camacho, J. (2013). Null Subjects. Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, R., & Schwenter, S. (2013). Pragmatics and variationist sociolinguistics. In R. Baley, R. Cameron & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 464-483). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheshire, J. (2005). Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social class variation in the use of discourse‐new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 479-508.
Coates, J. (1989). Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In D. Cameron & J. Coates (Eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities (pp. 94-122). London/New York: Longman.
Cornilescu, A., & Nicolae, A. (2012). Nominal ellipsis as definiteness and anaphoricity: The case of Romanian. Lingua, 122(10), 1070-1111.
Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax. Sage.
Cowell, M.W. (1964). A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic (Based on the Dialect of Damascus). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (2004). Should given information come before new? Yes and no. Memory & Cognition, 32(6), 886-895.
Despić, M. (2015). Phases, reflexives, and definiteness. Syntax, 18(3), 201-234.
Edwards, M. (2010). Word order in Egyptian Arabic: Form and function. In J. Owens & A. Elgibali (Eds.), Information Structure in Spoken Arabic (pp. 93-106). London: Routledge.
Eckert, P. (2017). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. The handbook of sociolinguistics, 151-167.
El Salman, M. (2003). Phonological and morphological variation in the speech of Fallahis in Karak (Jordan). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham University, UK.
Featherston, S. (2005). That-trace in German. Lingua, 115(9), 1277-1302.
Frampton, J., & Gutmann, S. (2000). Agreement is Feature Sharing. MS. Northeastern University.
Greenberg, J. (1966). Universals of Language. Oxford: MIT Press.
Gernsbacher, M.A., & Hargreaves, D.J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of memory and language, 27(6), 699-717.
Germanos, M.A. (2010). From complementizer to discourse marker: the functions of ʔənno in Lebanese Arabic. In J. Owens & A. Elgibali (Eds.), Information Structure in Spoken Arabic (pp. 145-164). New York: Routledge.
Habib, R. (2009). The syntax of the Standard Arabic particles ʔan and ʔanna. In K. Grohmann & P. Panagiotidis (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest (pp. 159-194). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Harley, H. & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 482-526.
Hawkins, J. (2015). Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. Routledge.
Heim, I.R. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Holmes, J. (2018). Sociolinguistics vs pragmatics: where does the boundary lie? In C. Ilie & N. Norrick (Eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces (pp. 11-32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hudson, R.A. (1996). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge university press.
Jarrah, M. & Zibin, A. (2016). On definiteness and information trigger in Arabic. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 55-67.
Jarrah, M., Altakhaineh, A.R.M., & Al-Rasheedi, E. (2020). ɸ-agreement within Construct State in Jordanian Arabic. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 73(1), 1-26.
Kremers, J. (2003). Adjectival agreement in the Arabic noun phrase. Proceedings of Console XI. Available online at http://www. sole. leidenuniv. nl/index. php3.
Kučerová, I. (2019). On the role of person in the mapping of syntactic features onto their interpretable counterparts. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 64(4), 649-672.
Labov, W. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In L. Winfred & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics (pp. 17-92). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs (pp. 28–53). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women's Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Laserna, C.M., Seih, Y.T., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2014). Um... who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328-338.
Leaper, C. & Robnett, R.D. (2011). Women are more likely than men to use tentative language, aren’t they? A meta-analysis testing for gender differences and moderators. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 129-142.
Löbner, S. (1987). Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics. Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 8, 53.
Liang, Y., Amsili, P., & Burnett, H. (2021). New ways of analyzing complementizer drop in Montréal French: Exploration of cognitive factors. Language Variation and Change, 33(3), 359-385.
Mirzapour, F. (2016). Gender differences in the use of hedges and first-person pronouns in research articles of applied linguistics and chemistry. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(6), 166-173.
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1977). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In P. Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English (pp. 19-36). London: Edward Arnold.
Mughazy, M. (2003). DPs Revisited: the case of wallaahi in Egyptian Arabic. In D. Parkinson & S. Farawanrh (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIII (pp. 3-29). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Owens, J., Young, B., Rockwood, T., Mehall, D., & Dodsworth, R. (2010). Explaining Ø and overt subjects in spoken Arabic. In J. Owens & A. Elgibali (Eds.), Information Structure in Spoken Arabic (pp. 20-60). London: Routledge.
Owens, J., & Rockwood, T. (2008). Yaʕni: what it (really) means. In D. Parkinson (Ed.), Perspective on Arabic Linguistics XXI (pp. 83-114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Peled, Y. (2009). Extended Versions of Type-2 And Type-3 Sentences. In Sentence Types and Word-Order Patterns in Written Arabic (pp. 187-224). Brill.
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 47-88.
Robinson, J., Lawrence, H., & Tagliamonte, S. (2001). Goldvarb 2001. A multivariate analysis application for Windows.
Rieschild, V. (2011). Arabic ya‘ni: issues of semantic, pragmatic, and indexical translation equivalence. Intercult. Pragmat, 8 (3), 315-346.
Ryding, K.C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S., & Smith, E. (2005). Goldvarb X: A multivariate analysis application. Available at: http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Goldvarb/GV_index.html.
Steele, S. (1978). Word order variation. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Human Language (pp. 585-623). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sidner, C.L. (1979). Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Artificial Intelligence Lab.
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 179-195.
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tsai, W.T.D. (2001). On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 10(2), 129-168.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & M. Yakov (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium (pp. 95-188). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Winford, D. (1996). Common ground and creole TMA. Journal of pidgin and creole languages, 11(1), 71-84.
Wolfram, W. (2006). Variation and Language: Overview. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition) (pp. 333-341). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Yassin, S. (2022). Agreement in Palestinian Arabic: An LFG Perspective. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, UK.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-04-20
Published 2024-03-30


