Interpretation of the Crime of Theft in the Light of the Theory of Rational Choice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i2.4951Keywords:
Rational choice theory, robbery, criminal incidentAbstract
Objectives: The study aimed to explain the crime of theft in the light of the theory of rational choice.
Methods: the study used the social survey method to collect data from a sample of 181 inmates. They study conducted a field study on inmates in Jordan's correction and rehabilitation centers.
Results: The study found a moderate effect of initial engagement, criminal incidents, and continuous indulgence in committing the crime of theft. The study also revealed statistically significant differences between the viewpoints of the study sample regarding the level of influence of initial engagement and the criminal incident based on gender and age.
Conclusions: The study recommends the necessity to achieve social justice through the development of legal systems by the legislative authority. The study also recommends the importance of strengthening the complementary function of the police, as they are the competent authority for the protection of public and private property and the implementation of the law.
Downloads
References
Williams III, F. P., & McShane, M. D. (2017). Criminological theory. Pearson.
Badayneh, D., Al-Khattar, A.,Al Hassan, Kh. & Al-Khuraishah, R. (2013). Theory of Criminology. (1st ed.). Amman: Dar Al Fikr Publishers and Distributors.
Brown, A., Stephen, E., Finn-Aage, G., (2013). Criminology Explaining Crime and its Context. (8th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Crime as a rational choice. Criminological theories: Bridging the past to the future, 77-96.
Agnew, R. (2003). Criminological Theory: past to present. LA: Roxbury publishing Company.
Jones, S. (2017). Criminology. (6th ed.). New York: Press 198 Madison Avenue.
Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American sociological review, 71(1), 95-122.
Jacobs, B. A., & Cherbonneau, M. (2019). Reconciling emotion and rational choice: Negativistic auto theft, consequence irrelevance, and the seduction of destruction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(6), 783-815.
Neissl, K., Botchkovar, E. V., Antonaccio, O., & Hughes, L. A. (2019). Rational choice and the gender gap in crime: Establishing the generality of rational choice theory in Russia and Ukraine. Justice quarterly, 36(6), 1096-1121.
Vandeviver, C., & Bernasco, W. (2020). “Location, location, location”: effects of neighborhood and house attributes on burglars’ target selection. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 779-821.
Cromwell, P. F., Olson, J. N., & D'Aunn Wester Avary. (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary (Vol. 8). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Townsley, M., Birks, D., Bernasco, W., Ruiter, S., Johnson, S. D., White, G., & Baum, S. (2015). Burglar target selection: a cross-national comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 3-31.
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York: free press.
Opp, K. (1997). Limited rationality and crime. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Dartmouth.
Adler, F.. (1975). Sisters in Crime: The Rise of the New Female Criminal. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hagan, J. (1989). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro-and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26(2), 116-135.
Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American sociological review, 588-608.
Simon, R. (1975). Women and Crime. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


