The Rise of Informal Intergovernmental Organizations in the Field of International Relations: The Case of BRICS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.1000

Keywords:

International relations, international organizations, formal intergovernmental organizations, soft organizations, informal intergovernmental organizations, BRICS

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to clarify the concept of Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) in international relations, focusing on BRICS as an example. We investigate why BRICS is classified as an IIGO, its key features, and explore explanations using critical international relations theories.

Methods: To answer these questions, the study depends on a descriptive analytical approach by studying a set of theoretical literature reviews about the international organization in general, and IIGOs in particular. In addition, the paper adopts the case study approach by concentrating on the BRICS as a model of IIGOs.

Results: The study highlighted that the BRICS bloc fulfills the aspects to be classified as an IIGO. For example, the BRICS membership is limited to states that are gathered around a common goal without a legally binding agreement, and it lacks many institutional aspects such as the presence of a general secretariat. In addition, the study shows the existence of a positive correlation between the emergence of IIGOs and the nature of change in the international system after the end of the Cold War.

Conclusions: There is a growing interest in IIGOs in world politics since the last decade of the 20th century. The study recommends considering the IIGOs as a complement to the FIGOs, in addition of being a substitute to them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Worth, O. (2015). Rethinking hegemony. Macmillan.

Booth, K. (2008). Theory of world security. Cambridge University Press.

Hayness, J., Hough, P., Malik, S., & Pettiford, L. (2017). World politics: international relations and globalization in the 21st century. (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and Soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421-456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280

Cooper, A. F., & Farooq, A. B. (2013). BRICS and the Privileging of informality in Global Governance. Global Policy, 4(4), 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12077

Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions, International Organization, 55(4), 761-799. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193592

Lisk, F., & Sehovic, A. B. (2020). Rethinking Global Health Governance in a changing world order for achieving sustainable development: the role and potential of the “rising powers”. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 13, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-00250-2

P.A., J. (2012). BRICS: Advancing Cooperation and Strengthening Regionalism. India Quarterly, 68(4), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928412467249

Scaffardi, L. (2014). BRICS, a Multi-Centre “legal Network?”. Beijing Law Review, 5(2), 140-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2014.52013

Ullman, R. (1983). Redefining security. International security, 8(1), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489

Vabulas, F., & Snidal, D. (2020). Cooperation under Autonomy: Building and Analyzing the Informal Intergovernmental Organizations 2.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 58(4), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320943920

Westerwinter, O., Abbott, K.W., & Biersteker, T. (2021). Informal governance in world politics. The Review of International Organizations, 16, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09382-1

Bliss, K. (2010). Key players in Global Health “How Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are influencing the game: a report of the CSIS Global Health Policy Center. Center for strategic and international Studies. https://bit.ly/3Kt9aQB

Kaddar, M., Milstien, J., & Schmitt, S. (2014). Impact of BRICS investment in vaccine development on the global vaccine market. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 92(6), https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.133298

Laidi, Z. (2011). The BRICS against the west. CERI Strategy Papers, 11. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2315108

PWC. (2017). The long view “How will the global economic order change by 2050?”. PWC analysis for projections to 2050. https://pwc.to/3xfBthx

Vabulas, F. (2014). The BRICS and the Future of 'Informal' IGOs. ISN ETH Zurich. https://bit.ly/3jnWBdm

Vabulas, F., & Snidal, D. (2011). Informal intergovernmental organizations IIGOs. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, Seattle. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1900274

Venkatapuram, S. (2012). Shifting paradigm: How the BRICS are reshaping global health and development. Global Health Strategies initiatives GHSi. https://bit.ly/3DWK4Hh

Westerwinter, O. (2016). The Politics of Informal Governance. University of St Gallen. https://bit.ly/3rcpJZs

Buse, K., Harmer, A., and Kirton, J. (2018). BRICS: Counter-hegemony in global health? Retrieved from https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/blogs/brics-counter-hegemony-in-global-health/

GDP Ranked by country 2022. (2022). In World Population Review. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3v4dD5U

Miller, M., C. (2021). Why BRICS still matters “BRICS may be a young institution, but it shouldn’t be underestimated”. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3jmwoMq

Davies, M. (2014). IR theory: problem-solving theory versus critical theory? e-international relations. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/37hGdFn

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Mourad , N. C. . (2023). The Rise of Informal Intergovernmental Organizations in the Field of International Relations: The Case of BRICS. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(5), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.1000
Received 2022-04-10
Accepted 2022-11-13
Published 2023-10-30