Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Dissonance Scale among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.1118Keywords:
Psychometric properties, building a scale, cognitive dissonance, Al al-Bayt University, studentsAbstract
Objective: The current study aimed to provide psychometric properties for a new measure of cognitive dissonance. The study also aimed to find out the level of cognitive dissonance for university students according to the variables of gender, specialization, and academic level.
Method: The study sample consisted of (496) male and female students from Al al-Bayt University, Jordan. The scale was built based on Festinger's theory, and the original cognitive dissonance scale developed by Cassel, Chow & Reiger. (2001), by providing realistic life situations that allow students to choose alternatives that reflect their tendency towards cognitive dissonance in real life situations. Indicators of validity and reliability were derived, and the dimensions and items of the scale were verified through confirmatory factor analysis.
Results: The results indicated that there was a medium level of cognitive dissonance according to the total score and all dimensions of the scale. Also, significant differences in cognitive dissonance were found in terms of students’ specialization and academic level.
Conclusions: The study recommends that researchers and educational administrations at secondary schools and universities use the current scale for research and diagnostic purposes and try to develop training and treatment programs to reduce the state of cognitive dissonance.
Downloads
References
Al- Otaibi, S. (2012). The Relationship Between Cognitive Dissonance and The Big-5 Factors Model Of The Personality And The Academic Achievement In A Sample Of Female Students At The University Of Umm Al Qura. Education, 132(3), 607- 625.
Brehm, J. (2007). A brief history of dissonance theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(5), 381-391.
Cassel, R. N. (2001). Second Force Psychology to assess cognitive dissonance areas and restore full service to Delinquents and Prison Inmates. Education, 121(4), 649-649.
Chow, P. (2001). The psychometric properties of the cognitive dissonance test. Education,122(1), 10-23.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. (1984). A New Look of Dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17(3), 229-266.
Egan, L., Santos L., & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance: Evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18(11), 978- 983.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
George, B. & Edward, M. (2009). Cognitive dissonance and purchase involvement in the consumer behavior context. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 8 (3&4), 1-24.
Joseph, R., & Rangaiah, B. (2017). Gender Differences in Cognitive Dissonance. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3), 72-77.
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods, 44(1), 1-23.
McFalls, E., & Cobb-Roberts, D. (2001). Reducing resistance to diversity through cognitive dissonance instruction. Journal of teacher education, 52(2), 164-172.
Montgomery, C., & Barnes, J. (1993). POSTDIS: A short rating scale for measuring post purchase dissonance. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 6, 203-216.
Reiger, R. (2000). Examining the" Cognitive Dissonance" of Students at Pleasantville High School by Grade and by Gender. Education, 121(1), 38-42.
Shimimol, P., & Koya, H. (2017). Relationship between Cognitive Dissonance and Achievement in Mathematics among Higher Secondary School Students. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(46), 42-66.
Stanchi, K. (2013) What cognitive dissonance tells us about tone in persuasion. Brooklyn Journal of Low and Policy, 22(1), 93-133.
Strickland, B. (2001). The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology. Gale Group.
Sweeney, J., Hausknecht, D., & Soutar, G. (2000). Cognitive dissonance after purchase: A multidimensional scale. Psychology & Marketing, 17(5), 369-385.
Wicklund, R., & Brehm, J. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-10-03
Published 2023-10-30


