“Hope” in Nada Jarrar’s an Unsafe Haven: Sisyphean and Cruel

A’yah Naim  Abdel Khaleq; Dina  Salman

doi:10.35516/hum.v50i5.1127

Authors

A’yah Naim Abdel Khaleq Department of English Language and its Literature, School of Foreign Languages, The University of Jordan, Amman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-6957
Dina Salman Department of English Language and its Literature, School of Foreign Languages, The University of Jordan, Amman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-3269

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.1127

Keywords:

Affect theory, hope, Sisyphean, Nada Jarrar, An Unsafe Haven

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims at examining the portrayal of hope through the lens of Affect theory. The objective of this study is to examine the way that hope motivates the characters of the novel to behave. The study also aims at examining how hope as an emotion does not bring about an optimistic outlook in the world of the novel, but rather creates disillusionment and pessimism.

Methods: This paper relies on affect theory particularly the works of Sara Ahmad’s “happy objects” and Lauren Berlant’s concept of “cruel optimism” in showing how hope in Jarrar’s novel is both an object of happiness and a source of misery for the characters of the novel.

Results: These results of this study show that studying the notion of hope that the characters seek in concepts and ideas such as marriage, love, and revolutions leads to what we would like to call a “Sisyphean” hope that further leads to disillusionment and discouragement. This hope we argue is not only “Sisyphean,” it is “cruel” because it is both futile and unattainable.

Conclusion: We conclude that the effect of hope is concurrently a source of optimism for a better future and Sisyphean in its cruelty as it leads to nothing but agony.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. (2010). 'Happy Objects' (pp. 29-51). Duke University Press.

Berlant, L. (2010). Cruel optimism. The affect theory reader, 93-117.

Easterlin, N. (2017). Place-in-process in Colm Tóibín’s The blackwater lightship: Emotion, self-identity, and the environment. The Palgrave handbook of affect studies and textual criticism, 827-854.

Hogan, P. C. (2016). Affect studies. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature.

Jarrar, N. (2016). An Unsafe Haven, London: The Borough Press.

Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural critique, (31), 83-109.

Brian, M., & Melissa, G. (2010). The future birth of the affective fact: the political ontology of threat. The affect theory reader, 9780822393047-002.

Mathes, C. F. (2019). Reading and the Sociality of Disappointing Affects in Jane Austen. Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice: A Feel for the Text, 85-103.

Miller, B. (2017). Affect Studies and Cognitive Approaches to Literature. In The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism (pp. 113-133). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Ott, B. L. (2017). Affect in critical studies. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication.

Wehrs, D. R. (2017). Introduction: Affect and Texts: Contemporary Inquiry in Historical Context. In The Palgrave handbook of affect studies and textual criticism (pp. 1-93). Cham: Springer International Publishing.