Creating Educational Content to Prepare Jordanian Children for Future Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i5.3112Keywords:
Future innovations, human workforce displacement, conceptual understanding, attitude toward learning, multimedia learning.Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of creating and using an educational animated video on Jordanian children’s conceptual understanding of and attitude towards the roles and functions of future innovations in human society. Mayer’s principles of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) guide the design and development of the animated video and the intervention. The participants are 112 children in age 10 to 11 years old from three different districts of Jordan. The study uses a qualitative experiment design. The children were separated into experimental groups and control groups to investigate two different pedagogical environments. The first experimental group uses animated video within Multimedia Learning intervention. The second control group uses the Traditional Teaching method. To measure the intervention’s effects, the study uses pre- and post-conceptual understanding test and post-attitude questionnaires. To find out more about the experiences with using the animated video within Multimedia Learning intervention, a sub-sample of children were interviewed. The findings of the study reveal that creating and using animation have a statistically significant effect, at the 0.05 level, on children’s conceptual understanding of future innovations and future challenges. Their attitudes towards learning about the future innovations are positive.
Downloads
References
Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 603–617.
Barcevičius, E., Cibaitė, G., Codagnone, C., Gineikytė, V., Klimavičiūtė, L., Liva, G., Matulevič, L., Misuraca, G., & Vanini, I. (2019). Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU.
Beydoğan, H. ömer, & Hayran, Z. (2015). The Effect of Multimedia-Based Learning on the Concept Learning Levels and Attitudes of Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 261–279.
Carrington, W. J., & Fallick, B. (2017). Why Do Earnings Fall with Job Displacement? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 56(4), 688–722.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
Cornelio-mar, E. M. (2015). Mexican Children and American Cartoons: Foreign References in Animation. 125–132.
Crosier, J. K., Cobb, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science. Computers & Education, 38(1), 77–94.
Draper, S. W., Brown, M. I., Henderson, F. P., & McAteer, E. (1996). Integrative evaluation: An emerging role for classroom studies of CAL. Computers & Education, 26(1–3), 17–32.
Gartner. (2015). Media Alert: Gartner Announces Customer 360 Summit 2015. Business Wire (English). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c62988978&site=ehost-live
Geissbauer, R., Vedso, J., & Schrauf, S. (2016). Industry 4.0–Building the digital enterprise (2016). PWC 2016 Global Industry 4.0 Survey.
Hall, G. F., & Cohen, M. J. (1988). Dendritic amputation redistributes sprouting evoked by axotomy in lamprey central neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 8(10), 3598–3606.
Held, C., Vosgerau, G. M.-G., & Knauff, M. (2006). Mental Models and the Mind: Current developments in Cognitive Psychology, Neuroscience and Philosophy of Mind. Elsevier.
Higgins, S. J., Higgins, S., Packard, N., & Race, P. (2000). 500 ICT Tips for Primary Teachers. Psychology Press.
Jackson, I. (2018). The future of technology integration. Electronic Product Design, 20(2), 51.
Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social research. An Integrated.
Kumar, D. D., & Sherwood, R. D. (2007). Effect of a Problem Based Simulation on the Conceptual Understanding of Undergraduate Science Education Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 239–246.
LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2007). Understanding and interpreting effect size measures. Social Work Research, 31(4), 243–248.
Lee, S. M., & Trimi, S. (2018). Innovation for creating a smart future. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 1–8.
Mayer, R. E. (2008a). Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence- Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction.
Mayer, R. E. (2008b). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760.
Mnguni, L. E. (2014a). The theoretical cognitive process of visualization for science education. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 184.
Naber, A. (2015). Qualitative experiment as a participating method in innovation research.
Norušis, M. J. (1992). SPSS for Windows: Base system user’s guide, release 5.0. SPSS Inc.
OECD (Ed.). (2015). Better skills, better jobs, better lives: A strategic approach to skills policies. OECD.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Richert, R. A., & Schlesinger, M. A. (2017). The role of fantasy – reality distinctions in preschoolers ’ learning from educational video. September 2016, 1–18.
Robinson, S., & Mendelson, A. L. (2012). A Qualitative Experiment: Research on Mediated.
Schryer, E. (2015). Effects of an Animated Book Reading Intervention on Emergent Literacy Skill Development: An Early Pilot Study.
Sharkins, K. A., Newton, A. B., Essa, N., & Ernest, J. M. (2016). Preschool Children’s Exposure to Media, Technology, and Screen Time: Perspectives of Caregivers from Three Early Childcare Settings. 437–444.
Sorden, S. D. (2012). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Handbook of Educational Theories, 1, 31.
Swerdloff, M. (2016). Online learning, multimedia, and emotions. In Emotions, technology, and learning (pp. 155–175). Elsevier.
Tayo, O., & Oluwakemi, O. (2015). Educational Multimedia and Learning Style Preferences. British Journal of Education, 3(12), 29–42.
Tyner, K. (2014). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Routledge.
Unterbruner, U., Hilberg, S., & Schiffl, I. (2016). Understanding groundwater – students’ pre-conceptions and conceptual change by means of a theory-guided multimedia learning program. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(6), 2251–2266.
Urhahne, D., Nick, S., & Schanze, S. (2009). The Effect of Three-Dimensional Simulations on the Understanding of Chemical Structures and Their Properties. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 495–513.
Vratulis, V., Clarke, T., Hoban, G., & Erickson, G. (2011). Additive and disruptive pedagogies: The use of slowmation as an example of digital technology implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1179–1188.
Williams, D., & Allen, I. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to optimize the value of robotic process automation. NY: IBM Corporation.
Williams, P. J., Jones, A., & Buntting, C. (2015). The future of technology education. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


