Analyzing the Discourse of Communication in Times of Crisis: The Speech of the CEO of Nestle for the Year 2009 as a Sample

Batoul  Al-Muhaisen; Samer  Hammouri

doi:10.35516/hum.v51i3.3711

Authors

Batoul Al-Muhaisen Department of Modern Language, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-4850
Samer Hammouri Department of Modern Language, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-3853

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i3.3711

Keywords:

Discourse and Influence, Human Communication, Urging Change, Discourse Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: The study aims to highlight the characteristics and features of discourse in times of crisis. It is an attempt to understand it through the study of the reciprocal relationships between language, culture, and society, with the aim of defining the concept of "discourse" according to Mr. Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, the CEO of Nestlé International, based on his speech during the April 23, 2009, crisis.

Method: The study adopted the descriptive-analytical approach to analyze discourse, in addition to the critical approach by utilizing the art of rhetoric and the systematic use of language. It highlights the role of rhetoric in communication by applying these methods to a written model representing administrative discourse during crises. Accordingly, dominant characteristics, sentence structures, and selected organizational and linguistic indicators were described to achieve a unified argumentation.

Conclusion: It was emphasized that the CEO of any company is the true guarantor of proper performance, as his/her professionalism in management, coupled with the discourse they deliver, ultimately yields positive and impactful results for the organization. Additionally, the study revealed that the achievement of success for a company during times of crisis is dependent on understanding discourse analysis in a hierarchical manner, i.e., from top to bottom, and exercising control over the comprehension of specific and precise decisions aimed at effectively guiding daily actions. Finally, the study emphasized the importance of business leaders' discourse and its influence on the acceptance of employees and other stakeholders in business, as well as on improving business standards and society.

Recommendations: The study concluded that it is essential to adopt studies that analyze administrative discourse during times of disasters and crises due to the significance of this approach in enhancing dialogue within and beyond the workplace to achieve benefits for both the work environment and society as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, J. M. (2008). Bibliographie. InL’analyse textuelle des discours, Paris:Armand Colin.

Adam, J. M. (2005). Les cinq types de textes descriptif, diagonal, narratif, explicatif et argumentatifs. Paris: Fac-Linguistique.

Agnès, H. G. & Gavard-Perret, M. L. (2004). Chapitre 36. In L’analyse automatisée de données textuelles en marketing. Paris.

Achard, P. (1994). Revue française de sociologie. InLa sociologie de la langue, Paris.

Crozier, M. (1964). Le phénomène bureaucratique, Paris: Seuiled.

Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le système. Paris: Seuiled.

Desrumaux, P., Machado, T., Van Droogenbroeck, A., (2016). Indicateurs organisationnels et individuels du bien-être. Edition Bulletin de psychologie.

Guilbert Th. (2011). L’évidence du discours néolibéral. Analyse dans la presse écrite, Le Croquant,colled.

Greimas A. J. (1966). Sémantiquestructurale, Paris: Dunod ed.

Harris, Z. S. (1969). L’Analyse du discours, Langages.

Orléan, A. (2002). Le tournant cognitif en économie, Revue d’économie politique, vol. 112, n° 5.

Igalens, J. (2007). Numéro 93. InL’analyse du discours de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise à travers les rapports de développement durable -Revue Finance-Contrôle-Stratégie. Paris.

Maris B. (2002). Introduction, Sciences de la société. N° 55.

McCloskey D. N. (1983). The Rhetorics of Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 31.

Nestlé: Good food, good life. (n.d.). | Nestlé Global. https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/asset-library/documents/investors/agm-2009/agm-2009-speech-brabeck-french.pdf

Lebaron, F. (2000). La croyance économique, les économistes entre science et politique, Paris : Seuil.

Légé Ph. et & Pereira J. M. (2013). Les conflits discursifs de gestion de la crise de la dette souveraine dans la zone euro, Colloque du CRIISEA « Discours de la crise et crise du discours ».

Longuet, S. et & Pereira, J. M. (2015). Discours de la crise, crise du discours, Économie et institutions [En ligne], mis en ligne le 01 juin 2015.

URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ei/971 ; DOI : 10.4000/ei.971

Seignour, A. (2009). Proposition d’analyse des discours. Toulouse : Ressources Humainesed.

Temmar M., Angermüller, J. & Lebaron, F. (2013). Introduction: Les discours économiques saisis par les sciences sociales et les sciences du langage. Paris : PUF.

Weick K., (1979). The social psychology organizing. London: Mc. Craw Hill Inc. ed.