Developing and Validating a Scale for Measuring Sexual Harassment in Higher Education

Hassane  Gharbi; Abu Elnasr  E. Sobaih

doi:10.35516/hum.v50i1.4399

Authors

Hassane Gharbi Management Department, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Alhassa Saudi Arabia
Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih Management Department, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Alhassa Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i1.4399

Keywords:

Sexual harassment, sexual harassment Scale (SHS), higher education, female faculty members, the paradigm of Churchill

Abstract

This research develops and validates a measurement scale for sexual harassment in higher education using Churchill's criteria for scale development to better understand the experience of young female faculty members. For this purpose, the researchers used a sequential mixed methods approach. Following a critical review of the literature, in-depth interviews were conducted with young female faculty members who are in the early stages of their academic careers.

The results informed the design of the research instrument, pretested with a small sample of young female faculty members, and then self-administered to a larger sample of young female faculty members. The data were initially analyzed using exploratory factor analyses before being validated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The three dimensions of the final scale: the extent of the risk, weight of culture, and acts of sexual harassment showed good reliability values of 0.838, 0.816,0.821, respectively. The final scale also showed a satisfactory convergent validity value for the first dimension “0.53”, the second dimension “0.56”, and the third dimension “0.55”.The scale paves the way for future research and awakens the audacity of researchers to better understand the experience of female academic staff, especially young female faculty members.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M. & Stuart, M. (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge? Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), p1-11

Bentler, P. M., &Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), p588-606.

Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S. West P. J., & Van Wart R. M. (2020). Human Resource Management: Public Service, Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems. Sixth Edition, Sage Publications.

Berrey, E., Nelson, R. L., & Nielsen., L. B. (2017). Rights on Trial : How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpétuâtes Inequality. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and Its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), p345-370.

Browne, M. W., &Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of Assessing model fit. In KABollen& J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (p136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chappell, D & Di Matino, M. (2006). Violence at work. Third Edition. International Labor Organization.

Churchill, G. (1979). A better paradigm for Developing Measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), p64-73.

Conte, A. (2020). Sexual Harassment in the workplace Low and Practice. Fifth Edition, New York: Wolters Kluwer.

Cortina, L. M. (2001). Assessing sexual harassment among Latinas: Development of an instrument. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(2), 164.

Courcy, F. J. S., Morin, A., &Madore, I. (2019). The effect of Exposure to psychological violence in the workplace on commitment and Turnover Intentions: The Moderating Role of Social Support and Role Stressors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(19), p4162-4190.

Davis, J. P., Tucker, J. S., Dunbar, M. S., Pedersen, E. R., & D'Amico, E. J. (2021). Effects of homophobicname‐calling and verbal sexual harassment on substance use among young adults. Aggressive behavior, 47(1), 5-16.‏

Dejoui, N.(2018). Les tunisiens divisés sur le risque d’un retour en arrière. L’économiste maghrébin. https:www.leconomistemaghrebin.com2018/03/09.

Dejours, C. (2000). Suffering in France. Paris: Le Seuil.

Didellon, L., &Valette-Florence, P. (1996). On the Use of adjustment Indices in the Structural Equation Models: Presentation and Recommendations Of Use. Days Nat. IAE, Toulouse.

El Akremi, A. (2000). Contribution to the study of the role of human resource management in the transition from potential to actual flexibility. Doctoral dissertation in management science. University of Social Sciences of Toulouse, LIHRE.

Evrard, Y., Pras, B., & Roux, E. (2000). Market: Etudes etRecherchesen Marketing, avec la collaboration de Choffray JM. Dussaix AM et Claessens M., Paris: Dunod.‏

Faulkner, S. L., & Adams, T. E. (2021). # YouToo: Notes on sexual harassment and assault in the academy. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1940844721991085.‏

Fitzgerald, L. F., &Cortina, L. M. (2018). Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century.

Fitzgerald, L. F., &Ormerod, A. J. (1993). Breaking silence: The sexual harassment of women in academia and the workplace. In F. L. Denmark& M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (p. 553–581). Greenwood Press/Greenwood Publishing Group.

Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., &Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring Sexual Harassment: Theoretical and Psychometric Advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), p425-445.

Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, A., Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, p152-175.

Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fisher, K. (1995). Why didn't she just report him? The psychological and legal context of women's responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, p117-183.

Fitzgerald, L.F., Buchanan, N., Collinsworth, L.L., Magley, V.J. & Ramos, A.M.(1999). Junk logic: The abuse defense in sexual harassment litigation. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law , 5, p730-759.

Gharbi, H. (2012). Stress, inefficient mechanisms of adjustment and burnout among faculty of higher education, case study Clashes,' impertinence. Journal of the Academy of ethics, 1, p85-102.

Gluschkoff, K., Elovainio, M., Hintsa, T., Pentti, J., Salo, P., Kivimäki, M., &Vahtera, J. (2017). Organisational justice protects against the negative effect of workplace violence on teachers’ sleep: A longitudinal cohort study. Occup Environ Med, 74(7), p511-516.‏

Goh, J. X., Bandt-Law, B., Cheek, N. N., Sinclair, S., & Kaiser, C. R. (2021). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260

Gruber, J. E. (1990). Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research. Population Research and Policy Review, 9(3), p235-254.

Gutek, B. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall. ‏

Hart, P. M. (1994). Teacher quality of work life: Integrating work experience, psychological and moral distress. Journal of occupational and organizational Psychology, 67(2), p109-132.

Hershcovis, M. S., Vranjes, I., Berdahl, J. L., & Cortina, L. M. (2021). See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: Theorizing network silence around sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology (in press).

Hirigoyen, MF (2001). Discontents work. Prejudice: disentangle fact from fiction. Paris: Syros.

Hulland, J. S. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), p195-204.

Igalens, J. &Roussel, P. (1998). From Research Methods in Human Resource Management. Paris: Economica.

Jöreskog, K. &Sörbom, D. (1994). LISREL, A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Judge, T. & A. Hulin, C. L. (1993). Job satisfaction as a reflection of provision: a multiple source causal analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), p388-421.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), p31-36.

Kaukiainen, A., Salmivalli, C., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Lahtinen, A., Kostamo, A., Lagerspetz, K. (2001). Overt and covert aggression in work settings in relation to the subjective well-being of employed. Aggressive Behavior, 27(5), p360-371.

Kayuni, H. M. (2009). The challenge of studying sexual harassment in higher education: An experience from the University of Malawi’s Chancellor College. Journal of International Women's Studies, 11(2), p83-99.‏

Kirkner, A. C., Lorenz, K., &Mazar, L. (2020). Faculty and staff reporting &disclosure of sexual harassment in higher education. Gender and Education, 1-17.‏

Lord, V. B. (1998). Characteristics of violence in state government. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(4), p489-503.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Pathé, M., Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(1), p12-17.

Pedhazur, EJ &PedhazurShmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement design, and analysis, an integrated approach. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rasool, S. F, Wang, M, Zhang, Y; Samma, M. (2020). Sustainable Work Performance: The Roles of Workplace Violence and Occupational Stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), p912-924.

Robinson, S. & Bennett, R. S. (1995). A typology of Deviant Workplace Behavior: A Multidimensional, Academy of Management Journal, 38(28) p555-573.

Roussel, P. (2005). Ladders Development methods for survey questionnaires. In P. Roussel&F.Wacheux (Eds.), Human Resource Management: Social Science Research Methods. Brussels: De Boeck.

Shütz, A. (1987). The researcher everyday' Meridians. Paris: Kliencksieck.

Skempes, D., Stucki, G., &Bickenbach, J. (2015). Health-Related Rehabilitation and Human Rights: Analyzing States Obligations Under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(1), p163-173.

Sobaih, A. E., Ibrahim, Y., Gamal, S., Shaker, A., Hassanien, A., Abdelrady, M., & Saleh, M. (2018). The state of young scientists in Egypt. Unpublished report by Egyptian Young Academy of Science (EYAS), Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt.

Soares, A. (2002). When Work Becomes Indecent: Psychological Harassment at Work. Research Report. UQAM.

Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O., Lancaster, A., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). Towards the standardized measurement of sexual harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoDusing Item Response Theory. Military Psychology, 14, p49-72.

Steiger, J. H. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA. 1980.‏

Stockdale, M. S. (Ed.). (1996). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies (Vol. 5). London: Sage Publications. ‏

Tariq, N., & Kamal, A. (1997). Sexual harassment experience questionnaire for workplaces of Pakistan: Development and validation. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, p1-20.

Till, F.J. (1980). Sexual harassment : A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington DC : National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs.

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Young, S. L., &Wiley, K. K. (2021). Erased: Why faculty sexual misconduct is prevalent and how we could prevent it. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1-25.‏

Wilson, C.B. (1991), US businesses suffer from workplace trauma, Personnel Journal, Vol. 70, p47‐50.