Love for God: Intertextuality in Nizami Ganjavi's Leyli o Majnun and the Quran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v52i1.4540Keywords:
Love for God, Majnun and Layla, intertextuality, Islamic ValuesAbstract
Objectives: This study aimed to show the threads of the intertextuality that bind texts of Nizam Ganjavi’s Leyli o Majnun and the Quran together.
Methods: This study used the qualitative approach. The study’s data was collected via identifying and categorizing the texts related to Allah’s love in Leyli o Majnun. Data was analyzed relying on the poetics of Julia Kristeva’s theory of intertextuality.
Results: The study results showed that the Islamic values discussed in Leyli o Majnun fall into three different categories: Shari’a, ethics and doctrine. The results also showed that those Islamic values are derived from the Quranic verses.
Conclusions: This study implicitly alludes to the notion that the Islamic values integrated in the body of the text are meant to show the greatness of Allah’s love. The study also recommends that the kind of love among humans portrayed in the text is nothing compared to the love that Allah reciprocates with His worshippers
Downloads
References
Abdollahvand, Z. (2022). Intertextuality of Chekhov’s “The Bet” with the Quran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20220801.14
Amalia, I., Riani, W., & Julia, A. (2016). The Influence of Religiosity Values on Happiness with Islamic Consuming Ethics as Moderator Variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.04.044
Sulistiani, B., & Pardede, M. (2022). Forbidden Love In Nizami Ganzavi ‘S Layla Majnun And William Shakespeare ‘S Romeo Juliet–A Comparative Literature. Ability: Journal of Education and Social Analysis, 73-86.https://doi.org/10.51178/jesa.v3i2.521
Bayman, H. (2003). The Secret of Islam: Love and Law in the Religion of Ethics. North Atlantic Books.
Bazerman, C. (2003). Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts. In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices (pp. 83–96). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609526
Burgel, J. C., Anvar, L., Berg, G. van den, Casari, M., & Franke, P. (2011). A Key to the Treasure of the Hakim : Artistic and Humanistic Aspects of Nizami Ganjavi’s Khamsa. In J. C. Burgel & C. van Ruymbeke (Eds.), A Key to the Treasure of the Hakim : Artistic and Humanistic Aspects of Nizami Ganjavi’s Khamsa. Leiden University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789087280970
Chittick, W. (2014). Love in Islamic Thought. Religion Compass, 8(7), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12112
Ebrahimi, M., & Yusoff, K. (2017). Islamic Identity, Ethical Principles and Human Values. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 325. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v6i1.p325-336
Elaskary, M., & Yun, E. (2017). Death, Resurrection, and Shrine Visitations: An Islamic Perspective. Religions, 8(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8030034
Elkaisy-Friemuth, M. (2017). God and Humans in Islamic Thought. Routledge.
Ganjavi, N. (1966). The Story of Layla and Majnun-. Bruno Cassirer.
Gjurgjan, L. (2008). Types of Intertextuality. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia : Revue Publiée Par Les Sections Romane, Italienne et Anglaise de La Faculté Des Lettres de l’Université de Zagreb, 53, 67–85.
Humaira, M. A. (2019). Layla Majnun: Literature Psychological Study. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 1(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v1i1.8
Hutcheon, L. (2012). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
Ilyas, Y. (2000). Kuliah Akhlaq. LPPI UMY.
Ismatullah, D. (2013). Mitos Cinta Layla Majnun:(Kajian Mitologi Roland Barthes). Alfaz (Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots), 1(1), 83-105.https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.vol10.iss1.8161
Jay, C. (2014). The Kantian Moral Hazard Argument for religious fictionalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 75(3), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-013-9435-0
Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C. (2017). Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704729
Long, Y., & Yu, G. (2020). Intertextuality Theory and Translation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(9), 1106. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1009.14
Man, P. De, & Riffaterre, M. (1981). Hypogram and Inscription: Michael Riffaterre’s Poetics of Reading. Diacritics, 11(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.2307/464972
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (36th ed.). Remaja Rosda Karya.
Ratna, N. K. (2013). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.
Riffaterre, M. (1978). Semiotics of Poetry. Indiana University Press.
Sanders, J. (2017). Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. In Forum for Modern Language Studies (Vol. 53, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqw047
Seyed‐Gohrab, A. (2019). Longing for Love: The Romance of Layla and Majnun. A Companion to World Literature, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118635193.ctwl0066
Suharsono. (2014). Penggunaan Metafora dalam Layla Majnun. Adabiyyat, 13(2).https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2014.13202
Toril Moi, E. (1986) The Kristeva Reader. In Columbia University Press. Columbia University Press.
Zengin, M. (2016). An Introduction to Intertextuality as a Literary Theory: Definitions, Axioms and the Originators. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 2016(50), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.5505/pausbed.2016.96729
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-12-24
Published 2024-11-14


