Design Studio Pedagogy: A Comparative Study of Teaching Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v52i6.7169Keywords:
Design Studio Pedagogy, Teaching Approaches, Comparative Study.Abstract
Objectives: This study presents a comparative analysis of various teaching methodologies within design studio instruction, focusing on their impact on student learning outcomes, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
Methods: Utilizing both quantitative and qualitative research methods, the study includes a student survey and interviews with faculty members.
Results: The results, derived from a comprehensive survey of 100 students from universities in Bahrain, reveal a positive perception of design studios. Interviews with instructors highlight the strengths and challenges inherent in different teaching methods. Traditional lectures are effective in conveying fundamental knowledge, whereas project-based learning, design thinking, collaborative learning, and experiential learning prioritize hands-on experiences, real-world applications, and innovation.
Conclusion: The study identifies challenges such as technological issues and resource constraints, and proposes tailored teaching methods, enhanced engagement, resource provision, and professional development as mitigation strategies. This research provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of various educational approaches and offers recommendations for improving design studio education and addressing challenges to enhance the overall educational experience.
Downloads
References
Archila, P. A., Ortiz, B. T., & Truscott de Mejía, A. M. (2024). Beyond the Passive Absorption of Information: Engaging Students in the Critical Reading of Scientific Articles. Science & Education, 1-35.
Awacorach, J., Jensen, I., Lassen, I., Olanya, D. R., Zakaria, H. L., & Tabo, G. O. (2021). Exploring Transition in Higher Education: Engagement and Challenges in Moving from Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered Learning. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 113-130.
Bature, I. J. (2020). The Mathematics teachers shift from the traditional teacher-centred classroom to a more constructivist student-centred epistemology. Open Access Library Journal, 7(5), 1-26.
Bramble, C., & Bahadur, R. (2021). Actively Achieving Greater Racial Equity in Law School Classrooms. Clev. St. L. Rev., 70, 709.
Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Coffman, S., Iommi, M., & Morrow, K. (2023). Scaffolding as active learning in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(1), 232-237.
El Marsafawy, H., Blibech, O., Elzefzafy, H., Al-Ayash, A. A., & Reda, I. (2020). Project-Based Learning By Experimental-Based Learning: Efficient Hands-On Practice In Interior Design Engineering Education. Proceedings of ICERI2020 Conference, 9th-10th November 2020.
Endrawan, I. B., & Aliriad, H. (2023). Problem-Based Collaborative Learning Model Improves Physical Education Learning Outcomes for Elementary School Students. Mimbar PGSD Undiksa, 11(1), 9-17.
Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Flores, M. A., & Lima, R. M. (2014). Engaging students in learning: findings from a study of project-based education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 55-67.
González-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 10366.
Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217-240.
Hettithanthri, U., & Hansen, P. (2022). Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2343-2364.
Lotfabadi, P., & Iranmanesh, A. (2024). Evaluation of learning methods in architecture design studio via analytic hierarchy process: a case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(1), 47-64.
Lynas, E., Budge, K., & Beale, C. (2013). Hands on: The importance of studio learning in design education. Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 2(2), 127-138.
Ningsih, S. R., Disman, D., Ahman, E., Suwatno, S., & Riswanto, A. (2020). Effectiveness of using the project-based learning model in improving creative-thinking ability. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1628-1635.
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391.
Silva, P. E. B. F. (2024). Theory and practice of historical method in David Hume.
Tesar, M. (2021). Philosophy as a method”: tracing the histories of intersections of “philosophy, methodology,” and “education. Qualitative inquiry, 27(5), 544-553.
Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1).
Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Uyun, M., Afandi, M., & Hamengkubuwono, H. (2021). The impact of collaborative learning on learners’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 443-460
Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 104415.
Zhu, W., Ma, C., Zhao, X., Wang, M., Heidari, A. A., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2020). Evaluation of sino foreign cooperative education project using orthogonal sine cosine optimized kernel extreme learning machine. IEEE access, 8, 61107-61123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-07-09
Published 2025-06-01
