Humanistic Characterization Yet Unattainable Miscegenation: A Contrapuntal Reading of Shakespeare’s Humanism

Lina  Saleh

doi:10.35516/hum.v50i5.798

Authors

Lina Saleh Department of English Language and Literature, Salt Faculty of Human Sciences, Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9558-6048

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.798

Keywords:

Shakespeare, renaissance humanism, orientalism, Edward Said’s humanism, miscegenation

Abstract

Objectives: This study proposes a contrapuntal reading for the Oriental/Westerner interracial marriages in William Shakespeare’s Othello, Antony and Cleopatra, and The Merchant of Venice. It aims to show that Edward Said’s postmodern humanism provides intriguing insights which challenge the mainstream interpretations implied by Renaissance humanism.

Methods: The study deconstructs the point-counterpoint structure in the aforesaid plays to acknowledge the feasibility of different interpretations for the Oriental discourse using Said’s postmodern humanism. It compares and contrasts Shakespeare’s Renaissance humanism with Said’s understanding of postmodern humanism to show that the latter underscores the necessity of inclusion and the triumphant integration of the Oriental in Western societies. The study opens the Shakespearean texts to new interpretations by examining their humanistic inclinations vis- à vis postmodern humanism which puts its philosophical stances into effective practice in order to influence the global imagination, empower the “Other” and entail ideological change.

Results: Shakespeare’s humanism mitigates his Orientalism but does not reverse the stereotypical representation of the “Other” as an individual with exotic cultural background who fails to have a normal relationship with a Western spouse. Shakespeare’s latent advocacy of the stereotypical representation of the “Other” becomes manifest in the outcome of the marriage relationship with the Oriental. The cultural barrier hampers the successful union between the Oriental and the Westerner; accordingly, Shakespeare portrays this relationship as either tragic or comic.

Conclusion: The final conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that Shakespeare’s mainstream Renaissance humanism informs his characterization, yet it does not reverse Oriental stereotypes nor does it condone miscegenation, if approached in the light of the tents of postmodern humanism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Manneh, B. (2018). Said's Political Humanism: An Introduction.

Al-Dabbagh, Abd. (2010). Shakespeare, the Orient, and the Critics. New York: Peter Lang.

Al-Shetawi, M. F. (2013). Arabic adaptations of Shakespeare and postcolonial theory. Critical Survey, 25(3), 4-28.

Bayouli, T. (2009). Elizabethan Orientalism and its contexts: the representation of the Orient in early modern English drama.

Boyer, A. (2015). The Other Interracial Marriage in Othello. Shakespeare, 11(2), 178-200.

Bradley, A. C. (2016). Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. anboco.

Bevington, D. (Ed.). (1992). The complete works of Shakespeare (pp. 1-526). New York: HarperCollins.

Chatelier, S. (2017). Beyond the Humanism/Posthumanism Debate: The Educational Implications of Said's Critical, Humane Praxis. Educational Theory, 67(6), 657-672.

Doren, M. (1953). Shakespeare. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.

Ghazoul, F. J. (1998). The Arabization of Othello. Comparative Literature, 50(1), 1-31.

Goddard, H. C. (1962). The Meaning of Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press.

Habib, I. (1998). Othello, Sir Peter Negro, and the blacks of early modern England: Colonial inscription and postcolonial excavation. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 9(1), 15-30.

Harrington, G. (2017). “Shadowed Livery”: Morocco in'The Merchant of Venice'. Linguaculture, 8(1), 53-62.

Knight, G. W. (1965). The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.

Millar, G. J. (1976). The Albanians: Sixteenth-Century Mercenaries. History Today, 26(7), 468-72.

Mitchell, W. J. (2005). Secular Divination: Edward Said’s Humanism. Critical Inquiry, 31(2), 462-471.

Mousley, A. (2015). Re-Humanising Shakespeare. Edinburgh University Press.

Nubia, O. (2016). Blackamoores: Africans in Tudor England, their presence, status and origins (Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia).

Nyoni, M. (2012). The Culture of Othering: An Interrogation of Shakespeare's Handling of Race and Ethnicity in The Merchant of Venice and Othello. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(4).

Said, E. (1993). Culture and imperialism Vintage. New York.

Tourki, M. A. (2014). The Place of the Gods: Biblical, Tragic, and Humanist Modes in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra.

Popa, A. (2013). Post-colonialism in Shakespearean work. Annals Constantin Brancusi U. Targu Jiu, Letters & Soc. Sci. Series, 91.

Suárez Müller, F. (2014). Towards a Synthesis of Humanisms in a Cosmopolitan Age: Thelate philosophy of Edward Said. Literature and Theology, 28(4), 476-490.

Radhakrishnan, R. (2012). A Said Dictionary. USA: Willy-Blackwell.

Roman, L. (2006). This Earthly World: Edward Said, the Praxis of Secular Humanisms and Situated Cosmopolitanisms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(3), 357-368.

Said, Edward W. (2004). Humanism and Democratic Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Spencer, Th. (1942). Shakespeare and the Nature of Man. London: Macmillan.

Spurgeon, C. (1966). Shakespeare’s Imagery and What it Tells Us. London: Cambridge University Press.