أثر برنامج تعليمي قائم على التعلُّم المُنظّم ذاتيًّا في التفكير الإبداعي لدى طَلبةِ الحلقة الثانية من مرحلة التعليم الأساسي في سلطنة عُمان في ضوء الكفاءَة الذاتيّة في الرياضيات
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i4.7695الكلمات المفتاحية:
برنامج تعليمي، التعلم المنظم ذاتيًا، التفكير الإبداعي، الكفائة الذاتية في الرياضياتالملخص
الأهداف:هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى تقصي أثر برنامج تعليمي قائم على التعلُّم المُنظّم ذاتيًّا في التفكير الإبداعي لدى طَلبةِ الحلقة الثانية من مرحلة التعليم الأساسي في سلطنة عُمان، وتحديد مدى تباينهم في التفكير الإبداعي باختلاف مستوى كفاءتهم الذاتية في الرياضيات.
المنهجية: تبنت الدراسة التصميم شبه التجريبي ذا المجموعتين بقياسين قبلي بعدي، وتكونت عينتها من (99) طالبًا وطالبة من طلبة الصف التاسع الأساسي، وقُسِمت العينة إلى مجموعتين: تجريبية تكونت من (53) طالبًا وطالبة، ودُرِّست وفقَ البرنامجِ التعليميِ القائمِ على التعلُّم المُنظّم ذاتيًّا، والأخرى ضابطة، دُرِّست وفقَ الطريقة المعتادة، وصُنِّفَ الطلبة حسب مستوى كفاءتهم الذاتية في الرياضيات (مرتفعة، منخفضة) قبليًا من خلال مقياس الكفاءة الذاتية.
النتائج:أظهرت النتائج وجود فرق دالٍ إحصائيًا عند مستوى (0.05= α) في التفكير الإبداعي في الرياضيات ومهاراته، يُعزى لطريقة التدريس ولصالح المجموعة التجريبية، كما خلصت النتائج إلى وجود فرق دالٍ إحصائيًا عند مستوى (0.05=α) في التفكير الإبداعي في الرياضيات ومهاراته يُعزى للكفاءة الذاتية في الرياضيات لصالح الطلبة ذوي الكفاءة الذاتية المرتفعة، وتوصلت الدراسة إلى عدم وجود تفاعل بين البرنامج التعليمي والكفاءة الذاتية في الرياضيات، في التفكير الإبداعي في الرياضيات.
الخلاصة: توصي الدراسة بإدراج البرنامج التعليمي المقترح، القائم على التعلم المنظم ذاتيًا في برامج تطوير المعلمين المهني، وتشجيعهم على استخدامه.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Volume 4 (1st ed., pp. 71–81). Elsevier Science. https://happyheartfamilies.citymax.com/f/Self_Efficacy.pdf
Callan, G. L., Rubenstein, L. D., Ridgley, L. M., & McCall, J. R. (2019). Measuring self-regulated learning during creative problem-solving with SRL microanalysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000238
Chong, W.-H. (2007). Fostering creative behavior in the Asian classroom: The role of self-regulatory and self processes. In A.-G. TAN (Ed.), Creativity: A Handbook for Teachers (pp. 423–439). World Scientific Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812770868_0023
Chyung, S. Y. (2008). Foundations of Instructional and Performance Technology. HRD Press. https://downloads.hrdpressonline.com/files/3420080326114240.pdf
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Ergen, B., & Kanadli, S. (2017). The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 69, 55–74. https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1148778
Gadsby, C., & Evans, J. A. N. (2019). Dynamically Different Classrooms: Create spaces that spark learning. Crown House Publishing.
Güneş, G. (2018). The Mathematics Backgrounds and Mathematics Self-efficacy Perceptions of Pre-service Elementary School Teachers. In G. J. Stylianides & K. Hino (Eds.), Research Advances in the Mathematical Education of Pre-service Elementary Teachers An International Perspective (pp. 171–186). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68342-3_12
Hattie, J. (2012). VISIBLE LEARNING FOR TEACHERS MAXIMIZING IMPACT ON LEARNING. Routledge.
Hidajat, F. A. (2022). Self-Regulated Learning for Creative Mathematics Teaching to Secondary School Students through Mobile E-Learning Applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(19), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i19.32513
Kaplinsky, R. (2019). Open Middle Math: Problems That Unlock Student Thinking, 6-12. Stenhouse Publishers. https://books.google.com.om/books?id=6Dq8DwAAQBAJ
Kaplinsky, R. (2023). Open Middle. Open Middle Partnership. https://www.openmiddle.com/compound-inequalities-2/
Kramarski, B., & Zoldan, S. (2008). Using Errors as Springboards for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning With Three Metacognitive Approaches. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 137-151,160. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/using-errors-as-springboards-enhancing/docview/204202696/se-2?accountid=27575
Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2
Leikin, R., & Kloss, Y. (2011). Mathematical creativity of 8th and 10th grade students. Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 1084–1093.
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM, 45(2), 159–166.
Leikin, R., & Sriraman, B. (2017). Introduction to Interdisciplinary Perspectives to Creativity and Giftedness. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and Giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 1–3). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_1
Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on Mathematical Creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 17. http://ezproxysrv.squ.edu.om:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.40248517&site=eds-live&scope=site
Ling, S. C. (2016). Development and Validation of the Singapore Secondary Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1815814771
Maloney, D. M., Ryan, A., & Ryan, D. (2021). Developing Self-Regulation Skills in Second Level Students Engaged in Threshold Learning: Results of a Pilot Study in Ireland. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00254-z
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.
Munahefi, D. N., Waluya, S. B., & Rochmad. (2018). Analysis of creative mathematic thinking ability in problem based learning model based on self-regulation learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012161. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012161
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Actions Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nugroho, S. W. P., Riyadi, & Triyanto. (2020). The analysis of algebra creative thinking skill based on strong mathematical habit of mind. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(1), 12100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012100
Oie, M., Fujie, Y., Okugawa, Y., Kakihana, S., Itaka, S., & Uebuchi, H. (2013). Self-Regulated Learning in School Transition and as a Creative Process. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity, Talent and Excellence (pp. 89–106). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-93-7_7
Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(April), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pape, S. J., & Smith, C. (2002). Self-regulating mathematics skills. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_5
Quigley, A., Muijs, D. M., & Stringer, E. (2018). METACOGNITION AND SELF REGULATED LEARNING Guidance Report. Education Endowment Foundation.
Rahayuningsih, S., Nurhusain, M., & Indrawati, N. (2022). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Study involving Indonesian Students. Uniciencia, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.36-1.20
Ramdass, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing Self-Regulation Skills: The Important Role of Homework. Journal of Advanced Academics TA - TT -, 22(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202 LK - https://squ.on.worldcat.org/oclc/5724697961
Rhine, S., Harrington, R., Starr, C., & Nikolai, W. (2019). How students think when doing algebra (eBook). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Runisah, Gunadi, F., & Ismunandar, D. (2020). The relationship between self regulated learning and mathematical creative thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 12004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012004
Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: an educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Singer, F. M. (2018). Enhancing Creative Capacities in Mathematically-Promising Students. Challenges and Limits. In F. M. Singer (Ed.), Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness: Enhancing Creative Capacities in Mathematically Promising Students (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_1
Tabach, M., & Friedlander, A. (2018). Instances of Promoting Creativity with Procedural Tasks. In F. M. Singer (Ed.), Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness: Enhancing Creative Capacities in Mathematically Promising Students (pp. 285–306). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_11
Toland, M. D., & Usher, E. L. (2016). Assessing Mathematics Self-Efficacy: How Many Categories Do We Really Need? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(7), 932–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615588952
Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği programının matematiğe karşı özyeterlik algısına etkisi[The effect of the primary school mathematics-teaching program on the mathematics self-efficacy of students]. Journal of Qafqaz University, 8(1), 1–8.
Veen, I. Van Der, & Peetsma, T. (2009). The development in self-regulated learning behaviour of first-year students in the lowest level of secondary school in the Netherlands. 19, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001
Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2005). Assessing Academic Self-Regulated Learning. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What Do Children Need to Flourish?: Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of Positive Development (The Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society (3)) (pp. 251–270). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_16
World Intellectual Property Organization(WIPO). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty (S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, L. R. Leon, & S. Wunsch-Vincent (eds.); 16th ed.). WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.48220
Yuliani, A., Kusumah, Y. S., & Sumarmo, U. (2019). Mathematical creative problem solving ability and self-efficacy: (a survey with eight grade students). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32097. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032097
Zakiah, N. E., & Fajriadi, D. (2020). Hybrid-{PjBL}: Creative thinking skills and self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 32072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032072
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (1st ed., pp. 13–39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 دراسات: العلوم التربوية

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
##plugins.generic.dates.accepted## 2024-08-18
##plugins.generic.dates.published## 2024-12-15
