The Strategy of Small States to Maintain National Security: A Case Study of the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.9629

Keywords:

Small states, Gulf Arab states, Balance of power strategy, Threat balancing strategy, Bandwagoning strategy.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the behavior of small Arab Gulf states (Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, and the UAE) within regional and international systems. It focused on analyzing the security strategies these states employ to safeguard their national security in a complex regional context. Additionally, the study explored how these states adapt to structural changes in the international system and effectively mitigate pressures and threats from neighboring major powers.

Methods: A comprehensive scientific approach was adopted, incorporating systems analysis to evaluate internal and external variables. Regional analysis was used to study interactions between these states and their surroundings, while a comparative approach was employed to assess and contrast their security strategies.

Results: The findings revealed that these small Gulf states implement similar internal policies to strengthen their domestic front, including controlled political openness and reinforced governance. However, their external strategies vary significantly: Bahrain aligned with major powers, Qatar and Kuwait assumed mediator roles, the UAE engaged in regional crises, and Oman adhered to a policy of neutrality and non-involvement.

Conclusions: The study concluded that the "bandwagoning" strategy frequently adopted by these small Gulf states reduces regional threats, enhances security, and strengthens their independence in foreign policy decision-making. This strategy has proven effective in ensuring their survival and resilience within a volatile regional environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Gharaybeh, M. H., & Bani Salameh, M. T. (2024). An Analytical Study of Iran’s Ambitions in the Arabian Gulf Region (1979-2022). Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(2), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i2.4136

East, M. (1973). Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models. World Politics, 25.

El-Dessouki, A., & Rafik, O. (2020). Small States and Strategic Hedging: The United Arab Emirates' Policy toward Iran. Review of Economics and Political Science, 6, 36.

Hayajneh, A., & Bani salameh , M. (2023). Regional Hegemony over the Security of the Arab Gulf States: A Case Study of Iran and Turkey (2003-2020). Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(3), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i3.5381

Jefferson, K. (2020). Hegemonic Influence and the Creation of Regional Architecture in Latin America. (polisci.web.arizona.edu/grad/102nd%20Annual%20APSA%20Meeting%20Paper-Kate%20Jefferson.pdf).

Kuznets, S. (1960). Economic growth of small nations. In Economic Consequences of the Size of Nations: Proceedings of a Conference held by the International Economic Association (pp. 14-32). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

=Torki Bani Salameh, M. (2023). Bahrain's Vision in the New Gulf Order. Middle East Policy, 30, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12675

Torki Bani Salameh, M. (2024). Kuwait's Hedging Strategy Towards Iran and Saudi Arabia. Middle East Quarterly, 31(2) https://www.meforum.org/65616/kuwait-hedging-strategy-toward-iran-and-saudi

Nye, J.S. (2010). The Future of Power. Kindle Edition.

Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51.

Rothstein, R.L. (1968). Alliances and Small Powers. New York, Columbia University Press.

SALAMEH, M. T. B., & AL-SHARAH, M. K. (2011). Kuwait’s Democratic Experiment: Roots, Reality, Characteristics, Challenges, and the Prospects for the Future. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 5(3), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2011.12023185

Schweller, R. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security, 19(1). Sherwood, L. (2016). “Small States’ Strategic Hedging for Security and Influence”. TRENDS Research & Advisory, September 14. http://trendsinstitution.org/small-states-strategic-hedging-for-security-and-influence/

Szalai, M. (n.d). Small Regimes in the Middle East: A Conceptual and Theoretical Alternative to Small States in a Non-Western Region.

Torki Bani Salameh, M., & Mohammed Alsmadi, L. (2022). The Impact of the United States on Military Spending in the Arab Gulf States During the Reign of Donald Trump: 2017-2020. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(4), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i4.2079

Van Evera, S. (1990). Why Europe Matters, Why the Third World Doesn't: American Grand Strategy After the Cold War. Journal of Strategic Studies, 13(2).

Vital, D. (1967). The Inequality of Small States. New York: Oxford University Press.

Walt, Stephen M. (2017). Who’s Afraid of a Balance of Power? The United States is Ignoring the Most Basic Principle of International Relations, to Its Own Detriment. Foreign Policy, December 8.

Waltz, K.N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Bani Salameh, M. T. (2026). The Strategy of Small States to Maintain National Security: A Case Study of the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 53(7), 9629. https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2026.9629

Issue

Section

Political Science
Received 2024-11-07
Accepted 2025-01-28
Published 2026-02-01