دور ChatGPT في التعليم العالي - مراجعة منهجية

Sana'a  Abu Safi; Mohammad Amin  Al-Qudah

doi:10.35516/edu.v51i3.7167

Authors

Sana'a Abu Safi Department of Educational Leadership and Foundations, School of Educational Sciences, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0501-4926
Mohammad Amin Al-Qudah Department of Educational Leadership and Foundations, School of Educational Sciences, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-0674

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v51i3.7167

Keywords:

ChatGPT, generative Artificial Intelligence, higher education

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to identify the potential benefits and drawbacks of using ChatGPT in higher education, as well as to determine the measures that higher education institutions should take to ensure its effective integration into education.

Methods: The study employed a systematic review method of studies published during the first year of ChatGPT's release (from January 2023 to December 2023). The Scopus database was selected, and the PRISMA extension was followed to identify suitable studies, resulting in the selection of 26 studies for inclusion in the current systematic review.

Results: The study results indicated a range of benefits of using ChatGPT in higher education, including: supporting self-directed learning, facilitating personalized learning, improving writing skills, providing advice and guidance, supporting distance learning, enhancing student performance and productivity, alleviating the burden on faculty members, and supporting scientific research. The results also revealed a range of drawbacks, such as: threatening academic integrity, excessive reliance on technology, privacy and security threats, generating misinformation, and bias. The results highlighted a set of measures to ensure its effective use in higher education institutions, such as ensuring equity in usage, providing training on usage, developing assessment methods, enhancing skills, and ensuring privacy and security.

Conclusion: The study recommends a set of measures and frameworks that aim to harness the benefits of this tool and avoid its negative effects, as well as develop programs and plans to implement measures related to integrating ChatGPT into higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M.H., & Cansu, F.K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429.

Akiba, D., & Fraboni, M. C. (2023). AI-supported academic advising: Exploring ChatGPT’s current state and future potential toward student empowerment. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article number 885.

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023), Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning, Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.

Biswas, S. (2023). Role of Chat GPT in Education, Social Science Research Network, Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4369981

Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Powered Conversational Educational Agents: The Inevitable Paradigm Shift, Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198-204.

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), Article number 38.

Chan, C.K.Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article number 43.

Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to Revisit Existing Student’s Performance Evaluation Approach in Higher Education Sector in a New Era of ChatGPT—A Case Study. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article number 2210461.

Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023). Writing with AI: University Students’ Use of ChatGPT. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 128-138.

Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74-88.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642.

Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70-88.

Elsen-Rooney, M. (2023), NYC education department blocks ChatGPT on school devices, Chalkbeat. Retrieved from https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/3/23537987/nyc-schools-ban-chatgpt-writing-artificial-intelligence.

Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Hatta, H. R. (2023). Analysing the role of ChatGPT in improving student productivity in higher education, Journal on Education, 5(4), 886-891.

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). 57-63.

Fuchs, K., & Aguilos, V. (2023). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Empirical Insights from Students about Using ChatGPT. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(9), 1365–1371.

Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614.

Hassoulas, A., Powell, N., Roberts, L., Umla-Runge, K., Gray, L., & Coffey, M. (2023). Investigating marker accuracy in differentiating between university scripts written by students and those produced using ChatGPT. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 71-77.

Henriksson Shackter, E., & Åshage Karlsson, M. (2023). RACE AGAINST THE MACHINE: Managing Disruption of Generative AI in Higher Education. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden.

Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system, BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), Article 100115.

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Artical 102274.

Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., Strampel, K. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: University student awareness, experience, and confidence in use across disciplines. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6), Third Quarter 2023.

Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT—A Challenging Tool for the University Professors in Their Teaching Practice. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article number 1056.

Kooli, C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), Article number 5614.

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), Article 100790. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.

Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., Klayklung, P., & Chocksathaporn, P. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in the digital era: Perspectives on chatbot implementation. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 64-74.

Liu, M., Ren, Y., Nyagoga, L. M., Stonier, F., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2023), Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools, Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 72-101.

Liu, Z., Vobolevich, A., & Oparin, A. (2023). The Influence of AI ChatGPT on Improving Teachers' Creative Thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 124-139

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article number 2236469.

Merino, L. S. G., Cabrera, S. C. T., Valdiviezo, B. Y. A. and Torres, A. M. H. (2023). The Impact of ChatGPT On Education: A New Era Of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Learning, European Chemical Bulletin, 12(1), 52-61.

Mukred, M., Mokhtar, U.A., Hawash, B. (2023). Exploring the Acceptance of ChatGPT as a Learning Tool among Academicians: A Qualitative Study. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 306–323.

Murugesan, S., & Cherukuri, A. K. (2023). The Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Education: The Promises and Perils, Computer, 56(5), 116-121.

Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews Journal, 10, Article number 89. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), Article number 5783.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?, Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 341–362.‏

Roose, K. (2023). Don’t Ban ChatGPT in Schools Teach with It, The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html

Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns, Healthcare, 11(6), Article number 887.

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of CHATGPT: Thematic Analysis and Follow-Up Survey. IEEE Access. 11,38805-38818.

Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M. H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023). Exploring computer science students’ perception of ChatGPT in higher education: A descriptive and correlation study. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article number 924.

Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks, Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4378735

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article number 1260843.

Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education, ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366.

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article number 15.

Verma, M. (2023). Novel Study on AI-Based Chatbot (ChatGPT) Impacts on the Traditional Library Management, International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(1), 961-964.

Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article number em2286.

Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article number 100147.

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching, Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-12.